Metrics Related to Value Chain Workers

[MDR-M.77b] The metrics are not validated by an external body other than the assurance provider, with the exception of TfS-related metrics, where the data is validated by TfS.

[S2-4.36] [MDR-M.77a] Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to workers in the value chain refers to the count of substantiated grievances received (where the complainant is identifiable as a worker in the value chain), legal cases, or other major issues flagged to Procurement or human rights experts, which OMV (or its subsidiaries) has caused or contributed to, as per the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. For each incident, we have scored the scale, scope, and irremediability from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high), and a calculation is applied to determine the severity of the incident. For metrics based on data from the OMV SpeakUp Channel, we assume that, unless the complainant is clearly a worker in the value chain, they are an OMV employee. Thus, in cases where it is unclear based on the subject matter, the incident is included in the count in S1-17.

[S2-1.19] [MDR-M.77a] Cases of non-respect of international standards (UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises) reported in OMV’s value chain is a count of severe incidents in which OMV’s due diligence failed, remedy was not provided, and/or the issue was not further addressed.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Total human rights grievances raised through SpeakUp Channel and Community Grievance Mechanisms by value chain workers. In 2024, these were included in the “total number of external complaints” reported in S3.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Number of audits performed by OMV Procurement with an external auditor: the number of audits performed with an external auditor is measured at the end of the year.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Number of TfS (re)assessments performed by EcoVadis: the number is measured/collected directly from the Tableau platform (provided by TfS). The scope of suppliers assessed in 2024 via EcoVadis is: first assessment, reassessment, and reuse from outside (supplier already assessed via EcoVadis at the request of other companies, but only entered in our database in 2024).

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Number of TfS audits performed: the number of suppliers who performed a TfS audit at our request is measured/collected from the OASIS platform. This includes full audits and follow-up audits.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Number of suppliers with a valid EcoVadis score: data generated from the EcoVadis platform plus selection of suppliers who responded to the assessment in the past three years.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Percentage of suppliers with improved EcoVadis score: this represents the total number of suppliers that have improved their overall score compared to their previous evaluations. The information is taken from the Tableau platform (provided by TfS).

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Number of buyers across all locations who attended awareness sessions on sustainable procurement: this is measured based on attendance lists.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Number of new suppliers screened for social criteria (e.g., child labor, forced labor, and collective bargaining) and environmental criteria (e.g., environmental certifications: ISO 14001, ISO 50001, etc.): the data is downloaded as an Excel file from the SAP Ariba platform.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Percentage of new suppliers assessed with negative social impacts (related to human rights, e.g., modern slavery, forced labor, child labor, etc. and improper business practices, e.g., bribery and corruption) in the supply chain that were disqualified: this is calculated based on the number of suppliers in prequalification who were disqualified vs. the total number of suppliers who participated in prequalification.

[Entity-specific] [MDR-M.77a] Suppliers that were trained on social issues: the data for sustainability training performed by suppliers is downloaded from the EcoVadis platform, then filtered for training focused on social issues. While in previous years we took into consideration all sustainability training (overall ESG issues), in 2025 the emphasis was solely on social issues, in connection with our IROs.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Percentage of spend with local suppliers: this is calculated automatically by Power BI based on total Procurement spend at OMV. The term “local” refers to the supplier country where the payment is made.

[MDR-M.77b] The metrics are not validated by an external body other than the assurance provider.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Total number of Tier 1 suppliers: this represents the number of our suppliers or contractors that directly supply goods or services to the OMV Group; it is collected from Power BI based on SAP records.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Total number of significant suppliers in Tier 1: this represents the number of A suppliers (those accounting for 80% of Procurement spend); it is collected from Power BI based on SAP records.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] % of total spend on significant suppliers in Tier 1: this represents suppliers accounting for 80% of Procurement spend; it is a fixed percentage, based on internal decision.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Total number of significant suppliers in non-Tier 1: the number is 0; based on internal assessment and historical data, there are no significant suppliers in non-Tier 1.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Total number of significant suppliers (Tier 1 and non-Tier 1): this represents the number of A suppliers (those accounting for 80% of Procurement spend); it is collected from Power BI based on SAP records.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Total number of significant Tier 1 and non-Tier 1 suppliers is assessed via desk or on-site assessments: the number represents the sum of TfS audits + audits performed by OMV Procurement with an external auditor; the information is collected from the OASIS platform (provided by TfS) and from our internal records on audits performed by OMV Procurement.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Target of number of suppliers assessed via desk or on-site assessments: this represents the target for our TfS audits.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Number of suppliers assessed with substantial actual/potential negative impacts: this represents the number of suppliers that have audit findings classified with red flags during TfS audits or audits performed by OMV Procurement with an external auditor; the audit data is collected from the TfS OASIS platform and our internal records.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] % of suppliers with substantial actual/potential negative impacts with agreed corrective action/improvement plan: all suppliers that have substantial actual/potential negative impacts based on audit results are requested to submit a proposed corrective action/improvement plan.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Number of suppliers with substantial actual/potential negative impacts that were terminated: this number is taken from our internal SAP records.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] Total number of suppliers in capacity building programs: this represents the total number of training sessions that we provide to suppliers via our internal resources (webinars held by the OMV Group) and external partners (webinars provided by TfS via the EcoVadis Academy); it is collected from our internal records and the EcoVadis platform.

[Voluntary] [MDR-M.77a] % of total contractors and Tier 1 suppliers assessed in human rights in the last three years: this is calculated based on a three-year analysis of contractors and suppliers evaluated via EcoVadis assessments, TfS audits, and OMV Procurement audits performed with an external auditor; information is collected from the EcoVadis and TfS OASIS platforms and our internal records.

• thereof where risks have been identified: the percentage is calculated based on the number of EcoVadis assessments with scores below 25 points and audits with findings classified with red flags; information is collected from the EcoVadis and TfS OASIS platforms and our internal records.

• thereof where mitigation actions taken: all assessments and audits with findings classified with red flags have mitigation actions.