Topics filter

Results

2 – Accounting policies, judgements and estimates

1) Changes in accounting policies

The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year, except for the changes as described below.

The Group has adopted the following amendments to standards from January 1, 2021:

  • Amendment to 16 Leases: Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions
  • Amendment to IFRS 16 Leases: Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions beyond 30 June 2021
  • Amendments to IFRS 9, 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16: Interest Rate Benchmark Reform – Phase 2

The amendments did not have any material impact on OMV’s group financial statements.

Amendments to IFRS 9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16: Interest Rate Benchmark Reform – Phase 2

The Group adopted the phase 2 amendments to  9, IAS 39, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 in which the IASB addressed the issues that arise during the reform of an interest rate benchmark rate, including the replacement of one benchmark rate with an alternative one.

These amendments are relevant for the following types of hedging relationships and financial instruments of the Group, all of which extend beyond 2021:

  • Interest rate swaps that are designated as cash flow hedging instruments and indexed to USD LIBOR
  • Other financial instruments like loan receivables, loans and borrowings, derivative financial instruments for which hedge accounting is not applied, and commitments, indexed to LIBOR (mainly USD LIBOR, JPY LIBOR)

The application of the amendments affects the Group as follows:

  • Changes to contractual cash flows: The basis for determining the contractual cash flows of financial assets or financial liabilities to which the amortised cost measurement applies can change as a result of IBOR reform, for example, if the contract is amended to replace the benchmark rate with an alternative one. The Phase 2 amendments provide a practical expedient to account for these changes in the basis for determining contractual cash flows as a result of interest rate benchmark reform. Under the practical expedient, entities will account for these changes by updating the effective interest rate without the recognition of an immediate gain or loss. For the year ended 31 December 2021, the Group applied the practical expedient to the JPY loan.
  • Hedge accounting: When the phase 1 amendments cease to apply, the Group will amend its hedge designation to reflect changes which are required by IBOR reform and will update its hedge documentation by the end of the reporting period in which the changes are made. It is not required to discontinue its hedge relationships. The Group has not made any amendments to its hedge documentation in the reporting period relating to IBOR reform. When the Group amends its hedge designation, the accumulated amount outstanding in the cash flow hedge reserve is deemed to be based on the alternative benchmark rate.
  • Additional disclosures related to interest rate benchmark reform are required. For details refer to Note 28 – Risk Management.

2) New and revised standards not yet mandatory

OMV has not applied the following new or revised IFRSs that have been issued but are not yet effective. They are not expected to have any material effects on the Group’s financial statements. EU endorsement is still pending in some cases.

Standards and amendments

IASB effective date

Amendments to IFRS 3 Business Combinations: Reference to the Conceptual Framework

January 1, 2022

Amendments to IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment: Proceeds before intended use

January 1, 2022

Amendments to IAS 37: Onerous Contracts – Cost of Fulfilling a Contract

January 1, 2022

Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018–2020

January 1, 2022

IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and Amendments to IFRS 17

January 1, 2023

Amendments to IAS 1: Classification of Liabilities as Current and Non-Current

January 1, 2023

Amendments to IAS 1 and IFRS Practice Statement 2: Disclosure of Accounting Policies

January 1, 2023

Amendments to IAS 8: Definition of Accounting Estimates

January 1, 2023

Amendments to IAS 12: Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction

January 1, 2023

3) Significant accounting policies, judgements and assumptions

Use of estimates and judgements

Preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judge-ments that affect the amounts reported for assets, liabilities, income and expenses, as well as the amounts disclosed in the notes. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are deemed reasonable at the date of preparation of these financial statements. Actual outcomes could differ from these estimates. The estimates and assumptions having the most significant impact on OMV Group results are highlighted below and should be read together with the relevant notes mentioned. Significant estimates and assumptions have been made particularly with respect to

Effect of climate-related matters and energy transition

OMV has considered the short- and long-term effects of climate change and energy transition in preparing the consolidated financial statements. The significant accounting estimates performed by management incorporate the future effects of OMV’s own strategic decisions and commitments on having its portfolio adhered to the energy transition targets, short and long-term impacts of climate-related matters and energy transition to lower carbon energy sources together with management’s best estimate on global supply and demand, including forecasted commodities prices.

OMV is aware of its responsibility and will live up to its commitment to the Paris Agreement and the EU climate targets. OMV is committed to becoming a net-zero emissions company by 2050 (Scopes 1, 2, and 3) and has set interim targets for 2030 and 2040, with well-defined actions aiming to meet the targets by 2030. Notably, by 2030, OMV aims to reduce its Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 30% and its Scope 3 emissions by 20%.

Nevertheless, there is significant uncertainty around the changes in the mix of energy sources over the next 30 years and the extent to which such changes will meet the ambitions of the Paris Agreement. While companies can commit to such ambitions, financial reporting under IFRS requires the use of assumptions that represent management’s current best estimate of the range of expected future economic conditions, which may differ from such ambitions.

OMV operates on a global market with global products and expects to see energy transition at different pace in different parts of the world. Hence, OMV’s mid term plan (MTP) assumptions, which are used for estimates in different areas of the group financial statements, including impairment of assets, useful lives and decommissioning provisions, are based on a scenario which is based on the IEA Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS) taken from the World Economic Outlook and adjusted such that the EU, the United States, China, Japan, and South Korea (with a two-year delay for political alignment and measuring effectiveness) are following the IEA Sustainable Development Scenario (SDS) and meeting the Paris Agreement targets.

To recognize the uncertainty in the pace of the energy transition, OMV performed a stress test analysis, using a decarbonization scenario which is built on the IEA SDS Scenario, where the entire world reaches the Paris Agreement commitment to be net-zero by 2070. The goal of this analysis is to assess the impact of this scenario on the recoverability of assets and valuation of liabilities.

The entire world following the Paris agreement targets has an impact on the global demand which impacts the oil and gas price assumptions, CO2 price assumptions, refining and petrochemical margins and cracks, power prices and spreads as well as volume development expectations which have been used in the stress test analysis.

Recoverability of assets
Commodity price assumptions may have a significant impact on the recoverable amounts of E&A assets, PPE and goodwill.

Oil and gas price assumptions have already been revised in 2020 to reflect the potential impact of energy transition and led to a pre-tax impairment of E&P oil and gas assets of EUR 1.2 bn. In 2021, the oil and gas price assumptions in the MTP scenario did not materially change in comparison to 2020. Consequently, no impairment losses or reversals of impairments due to changes in price assumptions were recorded.

Management continues to monitor the relevant commodity price assumptions in the future. This might lead to additional impairment losses or reversals of impairments.

In the stress test, OMV assumes for the E&P segment a USD 15-20 lower long term oil price than in the MTP scenario and the long term gas price to be lower by EUR/ 5. According to this stress case, the carrying amounts of the oil and gas assets with proved reserves would have to be decreased by EUR 4.2 bn.  In addition, goodwill would decrease by EUR 0.3 bn and some oil and gas assets with unproved reserves would be abandoned (pre-tax P&L impact of EUR 0.3 bn). The remaining carrying amount of PPE of oil and gas fields with a share of oil production higher than 55% would be EUR 2.2 bn in this stress case scenario.

In the  segment, the stress case reflects globally declining volume developments for almost all products resulting in negative growth rates and further decline in margins and cracks compared to the MTP scenario. This would lead to a further decrease in the carrying amounts in total of EUR 1.0 bn related to the Romanian refinery and the investment in ADNOC refining. The refineries Schwechat and Burghausen are resilient to such a scenario due to the strong focus of these refineries on petrochemical production.

OMV doesn’t see the segment materially impacted by the energy transition, hence there haven’t been stress test assumptions different from the MTP scenario.

The stress case was calculated using a simplified method. The calculation is based on a DCF model similar to a value in use calculation where no future investments for enhancements, improvements and restructuring have been considered. In the E&P segment, the cash flows are based on an adjusted mid-term planning for five years and a life of field planning for the remaining years until abandonment. In the R&M segment, the cash flows of the 5-year mid-term planning and a terminal value are included. The (negative) growth rates used for calculating the terminal value are estimated in line with the expected changes in the demand of the various products over the next 20 years. The stress case does not include any other changes to input factors than prices and volumes. It does not consider consequential changes that management could implement such as cost reductions, reserve reviews, divestments, and changes in business plans. The amounts presented above should therefore not be seen as a best estimate of an expected impairment impact following such a scenario.

Useful lives
The tangible assets in R&M will in average be fully depreciated over the next 7 years. Demand for petroleum products is expected to stay robust over this period of time. It is therefore not expected that energy transition has a material impact on the expected useful lives of property, plant, and equipment in the R&M segment. In the E&P segment, the remaining average life of field based on 2P reserves is 12 years and depreciation is calculated based on the “unit-of-production” method, therefore OMV does not expect that energy transition has a material impact on the useful lives of property, plant and equipment in the E&P segment. As OMV doesn’t see the C&M segment materially impacted by the energy transition, there is also no material impact on useful lives in this segment expected.

Decommissioning provisions
The economic cut-off date of E&P oil and gas assets does not shift significantly under the stress case scenario. The impact on the carrying amount of the decommissioning provisions is therefore expected to be immaterial.

For refineries, no decommissioning provisions are recognized. The refinery sites of OMV are expected to continue to be used for production even under a Paris-aligned energy transition scenario. Whereas the refineries in Europe have a strong focus on the production of chemicals and further measures for transformation of these refineries will be taken, also ADNOC Refining is expected to continue to operate under such a scenario.

4) Foreign currency translation

Monetary foreign currency balances are measured at closing rates, and exchange gains and losses accrued at statement of financial position date are recognized in the income statement.

The financial statements of Group companies with functional currencies different from the Group’s presentation currency are translated using the closing rate method. Differences arising from statement of financial position items translated at closing rates are disclosed in other comprehensive income. Income statement items are translated at average rates for the period. The use of average rates for the income statement creates additional differences compared to the application of the closing rates in the statement of financial position which are directly adjusted in other comprehensive income.

The main rates applied in translating currencies to EUR were as follows:

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

2020

 

Statement of financial position date

Average

Statement of financial position date

Average

Bulgarian lev (BGN)

1.956

1.956

1.956

1.956

Czech crown (CZK)

24.858

25.641

26.242

26.455

Hungarian forint (HUF)

369.190

358.520

363.890

351.250

New Zealand dollar (NZD)

1.658

1.672

1.698

1.756

Norwegian krone (NOK)

9.989

10.163

10.470

10.723

Romanian leu (RON)

4.949

4.922

4.868

4.838

Russian ruble (RUB)

85.300

87.153

91.467

82.725

Swedish krona (SEK)1

10.250

10.147

10.034

n.a.

US dollar (USD)

1.133

1.183

1.227

1.142

1

Only applicable for Borealis Group (see below)

In 2020, the items in the income statement related to Borealis Group were converted by using the monthly average rates instead of the annual average rate for the period after the acquisition on October 29, 2020.

IFRSs
International Financial Reporting Standards
IASs
International Accounting Standards
IFRSs
International Financial Reporting Standards
MWh
Megawatt hour
R&M
Refining & Marketing business segment
C&M
Chemicals & Materials business segment
net assets
Intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, equity-accounted investments, investments in other companies, loans granted to equity-accounted investments, total net working capital, less provisions for decommissioning and restoration obligations
LNG
Liquefied Natural Gas
EPSA
Exploration and Production Sharing Agreement
CGU
Cash generating unit
bbl
Barrel (1 barrel equals approximately 159 liters)
OCI
Other comprehensive income
ECL
Expected credit losses
FVTPL
Fair value through the statement of profit or loss
FVOCI
Fair value through other comprehensive income
net income
Net operating profit or loss after interest and tax