|
|
2024 |
2023 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audits performed by OMV Procurement with an external auditor |
number |
42 |
40 |
||
TfS (re)assessments performed by EcoVadis |
number |
570 |
224 |
||
TfS audits performed |
number |
13 |
8 |
||
Suppliers with a valid EcoVadis score (no more than 3 years old) |
number |
697 |
303 |
||
Suppliers with improved EcoVadis score |
% |
67 |
57 |
||
Buyers across all locations that attended awareness sessions on sustainable procurement |
number |
155 |
205 |
||
New suppliers screened for social criteria (e.g., child labor, forced labor, and collective bargaining) and environmental criteria |
number |
1,531 |
1,022 |
||
New suppliers assessed with negative social impacts in the supply chain that were disqualified |
% |
1 |
1 |
||
Suppliers that were trained on social issues |
number |
26 |
na. |
||
Spend with local suppliers |
% |
71.10 |
71.20 |
||
Cases of non-respect of international standards reported in OMV’s value chain1 |
number |
0 |
0 |
||
Severe human rights issues and incidents connected to our upstream and downstream value chain |
number |
0 |
na. |
||
|
Metrics and Methodologies
The metrics are not validated by an external body other than the assurance provider, with the exception of TfS-related metrics, where the data is validated by TfS.
Number of audits performed by OMV Procurement with an external auditor: the number of audits performed with an external auditor is measured at the end of the year.
(Re)Assessments performed by EcoVadis: the number is measured/collected directly from the Tableau platform (provided by TfS). The scope of suppliers assessed in 2024 via EcoVadis is: First assessment, Reassessment and Re-use from outside (supplier already assessed via EcoVadis at the request of other companies, but only entered in our database in 2024).
Number of TfSNumber of TfS audits performed: the number of suppliers who performed a TfS audit at our request is measured/collected from the OASIS platform. This includes full audits and follow-up audits.
Number of suppliers with a valid EcoVadis score: data generated from the TfS Tableau platform plus selection of suppliers who responded to the assessment in the past three years.
(provided by TfS).
Percentage of suppliers with improved EcoVadis score: this represents the total number of suppliers that have improved their overall score, compared to their previous evaluations. The information is taken from Tableau platformNumber of buyers across all locations who attended awareness sessions on sustainable procurement: this is measured based on attendance lists.
bargaining) and environmental criteria (e.g. environmental certifications: ISO 14001, ISO 50001 etc.): the data is downloaded as an excel file from SAP Ariba platform.
Number of new suppliers screened for social criteria (e.g., child labor, forced labor, and collective(related to human rights, e.g., modern slavery, forced labor, child labor, etc., and improper business practices, e.g., bribery and corruption) in the supply chain that were disqualified: this is calculated based on the number of suppliers in prequalification who were disqualified vs. the total number of suppliers who participated in prequalification.
Percentage of new suppliers assessed with negative social impacts(overall ESG issues), in 2024 the emphasis is solely on social issues, in connection with our IROs.
Suppliers that were trained on social issues: the data for sustainability trainings performed by suppliers is downloaded from EcoVadis platform, then filtered for trainings focused on social issues. While in previous years we took into consideration all sustainability trainingsPercentage of spend with localsuppliers: this is calculated automatically by Power BI based on total Procurement spend in the OMV. The term “local”: refers to the supplier country where the payment is made.
trafficking), scope (significant number of people being affected), and irremediability (difficult or impossible to remediate), while each one of them on their own can also make an impact severe. One of the limitations of this current approach is that findings from due diligence activities in the value chain workforce such as third-party audits or assessments (e.g., issues related to working and living conditions or ineffective grievance management) are not yet fully included in the current reporting period. Over the course of 2025, we plan to further improve the process of compiling value chain due diligence findings and to integrate them in the count of human rights incidents connected to our value chain workforce.
Number of severe human rights issues and incidents connected to our upstream and downstream value chain refers to the count of such incidents reported through our Community Grievance Mechanisms, as well as legal cases. We have defined the severity of human rights incidents based on categories of scale (e.g., forced labor, child labor, humanCases of non-respect of international standards reported in OMV’s value chain: in the reporting year, no cases of non-respect of international standards were reported, based on the limitations mentioned above.